
"America faces an existential crisis. If we do not get control of our borders, by 2050 Americans of European descent will be a minority in the nation their ancestors created and built. No nation has ever undergone so radical a demographic transformation and survived." --Pat Buchanan
US population, breakdown by race, 1800
White: 4,306,446 (81.1%)
Black: 1,002,037 (18.9%)
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
"The 1850 decennial census was the first census in which data were collected on the nativity of the population.... As a percentage of total population, the foreign-born population rose from 9.7 percent in 1850 and fluctuated in the 13 percent to 15 percent range from 1860 to 1920 before dropping to 11.6 percent in 1930. The highest percentages foreign born were 14.4 percent in 1870, 14.8 percent in 1890 and 14.7 percent in 1910.
"Since 1970, the foreign-born population of the United States has increased rapidly due to large-scale immigration, primarily from Latin America and Asia.... As a percentage of the total population, the foreign-born population increased from 4.7 percent in 1970 to 6.2 percent in 1980, to 7.9 percent in 1990, and to an estimated 9.7 percent in 1997."
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Dear Pat Buchanan:
You're an idiot.
Love,
--tiki
EDIT: I've cut off commenting on this entry, except for folks on my friends list. This entry is pretty well buried, so no one's going to see your comment, and anyway, I'm sure you can find better venues to chat about racism than a blog about plush toys.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 05:42 am (UTC)and I ain't hispanic, or latina, or mexican.
I'd ask if I could move in, but I know you have no room for MY stuff, lol!
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 04:29 pm (UTC)Oh, and you know if you're gonna be in the 'hood, let us know, so you can at least get the tour?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 04:08 am (UTC)and darn, my guy would be just crazed with a tour of your place, lol! Luke Skywalker is one of his few friends on My Space ;)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 08:35 am (UTC)"America faces an existential crisis. If we do not get control of our borders, by 2050 Americans of European descent will be a minority in the nation their ancestors created and built. No nation has ever undergone so radical a demographic transformation and survived." --Pat Buchanan
So how about those Native Americans, eh, Buchanan? Oh, yeah, you convineintly forgot that.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 12:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 10:52 am (UTC)http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/decennial/index.htm
What I don't like is that in 2010 the long form of the decennial census will cease.
The American Community Survey (emphasis on word survey), which has been around for a few years and is now usable for data on populations in areas of 65,000+ in population will catch up and in 2010 cover ALL areas in their data sets.
Thing is, you had a 1:4 chance of getting the decennial long form...you will have a 1:6 chance of getting the American Community Survey. So we're cutting down our survey sample for the "long form" by a *huge* margin.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 04:26 pm (UTC)I had no idea. We work with Census data a lot. Since we use an administrative database (ie, Medicare claims), we have to use census tract averages to plug in stuff like education and income levels for our patients. But, the quality of the data has declined over the last 5 years, and now I see it's gonna sink some more. *sigh* Just more BAD NEWS.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 02:33 pm (UTC)Legal immigrants are fine and dandy, Illegal immigrants should be stopped. If they aren't willing to take the time to come in the country legally, I don't want them here.
I'm for sealing the borders (this does not mean stopping LEGAL immigration).
Check out this zogby article:
http://www.zogby.com/soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=4935
"Most of those that emigrated from Mexico became naturalized US citizens and have become productive citizens. Unfortunately, some embittered intellectuals (on both sides of the border) have advocated that most of the southwest US belongs to Mexico. "
A lot of people are coming here to reclaim 'their' land, not to become US citizens and that's a huge issue.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 02:38 pm (UTC)What about terrorists? They could easily come across the borders too.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 04:39 pm (UTC)He was on Bill Maher show this week, and some of the stuff he said seemed, well, bullshit. He gave the raw number of immigrants, and said it was the highest in the nation's history. Well, duh, but now there's 300 million people here, so what's the number as a percentage of the population? So I looked it up. He seems like his deal is more scaring people than dealing with a complex and important issue.
A lot of people are coming here to reclaim 'their' land, not to become US citizens and that's a huge issue.
That seems a bit insane. They come to the US because they want LA to be just like Tijuana? How many is "a lot?" I grew up in SoCal, and knew bajillions of Chicano kids, but I never met a single one who wanted to live in the United States of Mexico.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 08:22 pm (UTC)I don't think the issue is so complex. People are coming here illegally and shouldn't be. Least in my opinion.
Did you read the article I posted? There are people who believe that parts of the United States really belongs to Mexico. I forget what the poll numbers were, but it was eye opening. Plus with that rally in Maywood... it's defiantely out there. During that rally the illegal immigrants took down the American flag and raised the Mexican one..
I think you can see it in this clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9eISWvvMdA
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-09-18 03:21 pm (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2006-09-18 01:54 am (UTC)Maybe the Republicans should run on their track record: record-setting budget deficits, the war in Iraq, the hunt for Osama bin Laden, the lack of job growth in america, the outsourcing of hightech/skilled jobs, their impotence in taking on domestic security measures, giving ground forces in Iraq the appropriate numbers, kevlar, and armored vehicles to be set up for success, crackdown on political corruption--oh wait, they can't run on that.
They do this every election cycle: whether it's Willie Horten, Swift Boat veterans, the pledge of allegiance, gay marriage, late-term (aka "partial birth" whatever the fuck that means) abortions, and now illegal immigration. I very much welcome an open debate on real issues, but time and time again the Republicans do not run on their record and they hide from real open debates on real issues, and this because they are in reality, a party of cronies, lobbyists, and religious crackpots, and their positions never stand the test of scrutiny from "reality-based society". They need to invent issues every election cycle. It's such a predictable pattern that as I get older we take bets on what the new Republican strawman issue will be each election. Do you really think for one minute that any reasonable and popular immigrant group in the US stands for separatism from this country? If you believe that what Buchanon is asserting is a material issue, then I have some (stolen) land to sell you from the Southwest.
Now on the topic of prejudice... I am very personally offended by this shitstorm the GOP is trying to create about illegal immigration. I am Hispanic (as were my parents and their parents and their parents), and am immigrant to the US from Cuba. As a legal immigrant, now why would I take offense to a strong stance on illegal immigrant? I think illegal immigration should be policed--no one in the mainstream of either party thinks that it shouldn't. So why is this an issue? The Democrats aren't for illegal immigration. The bottom line is that the Republicans want to use prejudice as their 2006 election strawman, because they can't run on their shitty record.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 02:39 pm (UTC)Hey Pat Buchanan: to a large extent, enslaved people built this country and most hispanic people have ancestors that predate your paltry half-century of occupation by 15,000 years. Get over yourself.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 04:44 pm (UTC)"You tricked me again!!!! --Mr. Tiki
Hey Pat Buchanan: to a large extent, enslaved people built this country and most hispanic people have ancestors that predate your paltry half-century of occupation by 15,000 years. Get over yourself.
See? That's the thing that sets off my liberal rant mode. Bush does it too! There's an assumption that "we" are all a bunch of White people, and not just white people, but from a very confined bit of Europe that evidently doesn't include the Iberian peninsula. You've heard Bush's constant rant about Iraq that "SOME SAY brown people don't want democracy." Um, brown people? Have you looked out the window lately?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 08:25 pm (UTC)That doesn't mean we should now enslave illegal immigrants O.o;.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-17 06:29 pm (UTC)-§parky
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 07:44 pm (UTC)You're an idiot.
You're infinitely more generous with him than I am.
I look at him with shock and appall. Heavy on the appall, with a extra heaping side order of WTF?!?.
Hey, Pat, you know my ancestory manages to hit 3 out the 4 most oppressed people: Jews, Irish and American Indian. All I need is an African ancestor and I'd be 4 and 0. And you know something else, at one time or another one group of ancestors suffered people who didn't think they should be here, have rights or citizenship, or for that matter exist. And I'd bet you'd have been agreeing with that shit.
We're a nation of immigrants or their descendents. Even you. Though, frankly, if I were one of your ancestors, I wouldn't want to claim you. And honeypants, we all know that your phrase "Americans of European descent" is a thinly veiled code for "whites", and more specifically "white anglo-saxon protestant". So, basically, if you were a politician around the time my people came to these shores, well, the Irish and Jewish ones anyway, you'd be screaming bloody murder about how we were diluting the "pure" blood of America and should be sent back home. As for the Indian ancestors, you'd be all for resrvations and extermination. *fake sigh* But those good old days are gone and now you have to make more coded comments like "Americans of European descent". But you know something, I don't think you're fooling anyone. So, darling Pat, shove it. Sideways.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 08:09 pm (UTC)Sadly, bozos like Buchanan *are* still capable of fooling people. He may even be fooling himself with his B.S., although my money is on that he's one of those who'll just do or say *anything* to have power over other people.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-18 08:16 pm (UTC)Besides, I still remember the "Jews for Buchanan" debacle in Florida.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 04:01 pm (UTC)Mr Buchanan has gone beyond concern over illegal immigration, justified or not, and into outright race-baiting. I resent the implication that I'm supposed to be scared of...what, exactly? Them filthy Mexicans? Losing my God-given white privilege? Fuck you, Pat.
Granted, Mexican candy can be kind of alarming, but maybe we'd get soda made with real sugar again.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-27 06:31 pm (UTC)Mexican candy with tamarind is to be avoided at all costs - so says the US agriculture dept. Apparently, it's pretty regularly "contaminated". You'd be surprised how much "American" candy is actually made in Mexico. Hell, even Brach's manufactures it's candy there.
maybe we'd get soda made with real sugar again.
*laughs* Actually, you still can...if you can get you're Dr Pepper from Dublin, Texas. Seriously. Made a
pilgrimagetrip there a few months ago.(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: